Byron Shire Council v MacAdam [2001] NSWLEC 232
The Court held that the council was entitled to costs as the respondent ultimately satisfied the council's claim through obtaining development consent, and there was no direct evidence of disentitling conduct by the council relevant to the class 4 costs determination.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Byron Shire Council; Respondent: Nanette Marion MacAdam
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Post Discontinuance; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs Order, Discontinuance of Proceedings, Development Consent, Interlocutory Relief
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Byron Shire Council
Applicant
Nanette Marion MacAdam
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Post Discontinuance; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs when proceedings have been discontinued by consent after related proceedings remedied the alleged breach
- 2 Whether there was disentitling conduct by the council affecting costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the council was entitled to costs as the respondent ultimately satisfied the council's claim through obtaining development consent, and there was no direct evidence of disentitling conduct by the council relevant to the class 4 costs determination.
Court Disposition
Respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings including the hearing on 11 September 2001.
- The exhibits will be retained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment