BYV v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2013] NSWADT 281

BYV v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2013] NSWADT 281

Leave granted to reinstate the appeal because the withdrawal occurred under a reasonable understanding of the law as it stood, which was retroactively changed, and legislative intent shows such persons should not suffer prejudice.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: BYV; Respondent: Victims Compensation Fund Corporation
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Reinstate Withdrawn Appeal
Outcome
Leave granted to reinstate appeal
Legal Topics
Appeal Under Victims Compensation Act 1996, Retroactive Change in Law, Transitional Provisions
Victims Support Statutory Interpretation Appeal Under Victims Compensation Act 1996 Retroactive Change in Law Transitional Provisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BYV

Applicant

Victims Compensation Fund Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Leave to Reinstate Withdrawn Appeal

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to reinstate an appeal withdrawn due to a retroactive change in law

Ratio Decidendi

Leave granted to reinstate the appeal because the withdrawal occurred under a reasonable understanding of the law as it stood, which was retroactively changed, and legislative intent shows such persons should not suffer prejudice.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to reinstate appeal

Orders

  • Leave granted to reinstate appeal filed 25 June 2013 and withdrawn 28 June 2013