BYZ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2014] NSWCATAD 168
Although the Tribunal extended time for the application, BYZ did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the alleged 1977/78 sexual assault at 87 Surrey Street was an act of violence. Her evidence was in significant conflict: one account alleged a broken wrist requiring plaster, while her detailed police statement omitted any wrist injury and described returning to work about 36 hours later. Because BYZ did not attend the hearing, the Tribunal could not test those inconsistencies. The contradiction meant the Tribunal could not attach significant weight to her evidence about the incident and could not be satisfied that an act of violence under section 19(1) of the Victims Rights...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Administrative Review Under Section 51 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 / Review of the Senior Assessor's Internal Review Decision Dated 23 September 2013; Final Determination
- Outcome
- The Senior Assessor's internal review decision was affirmed and the application was dismissed, with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['administrative Review' 'recognition Payment' 'act of Violence' 'balance of Probabilities' 'civil Standard of Proof' 'contradictory Evidence' 'weight of Evidence' 'extension of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Administrative Review Under Section 51 of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 / Review of the Senior Assessor's Internal Review Decision Dated 23 September 2013; Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time should be extended for BYZ to lodge the application for administrative review.' 'Whether BYZ established on the balance of probabilities that she was the victim of an act of violence within section 19(1) of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013.' "What weight should be given to BYZ's evidence where her accounts differed about an alleged broken wrist and subsequent treatment after the alleged sexual assault."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Tribunal extended time for the application, BYZ did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the alleged 1977/78 sexual assault at 87 Surrey Street was an act of violence. Her evidence was in significant conflict: one account alleged a broken wrist requiring plaster, while her detailed police statement omitted any wrist injury and described returning to work about 36 hours later. Because BYZ did not attend the hearing, the Tribunal could not test those inconsistencies. The contradiction meant the Tribunal could not attach significant weight to her evidence about the incident and could not be satisfied that an act of violence under section 19(1) of the Victims Rights...
Court Disposition
The Senior Assessor's internal review decision was affirmed and the application was dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The decision made by the Senior Assessor upon Internal Review on 23 September 2013 is affirmed.' 'The Application is dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment