Harrison v Valuer General [2010] NSWLEC 1253

Harrison v Valuer General [2010] NSWLEC 1253

The applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the statutory valuation was excessive, as the respondent's expert evidence, based on properly adjusted comparable sales, provided a sufficient and impartial basis for the valuation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Valuation Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['land Valuation' 'statutory Valuation' 'comparable Sales' 'expert Evidence']
['valuation of Land'] ['land Valuation' 'statutory Valuation' 'comparable Sales' 'expert Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Valuation Appeal / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the statutory valuation of 59 Dickson Street, Bronte as at 1 July 2009 is excessive or should be altered']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the statutory valuation was excessive, as the respondent's expert evidence, based on properly adjusted comparable sales, provided a sufficient and impartial basis for the valuation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed' 'The statutory valuation of the Valuer General for 59 Dickson Street, Bronte, as at the base date of 1 July 2009 is confirmed' 'The exhibits are retained']