C J Redman Constructions Pty Ltd v Tarnap Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 172

There was no evidence of a threat to assets sufficient to justify Mareva relief; the application for Mareva orders was declined.

Parties: Plaintiff: C J Redman Constructions Pty Limited; Defendant: Tarnap Pty Limited
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 09 March 2006
Procedural Posture: Application for Mareva Orders / Ex Parte Hearing
Outcome: Order not granted
Legal Topics: Mareva Orders, Practice and Procedure, Threat to Assets

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

C J Redman Constructions Pty Limited

Plaintiff

Tarnap Pty Limited

Defendant

Application for Mareva Orders / Ex Parte Hearing

1 Whether there is sufficient evidence of a threat to assets to justify granting Mareva orders
2 Whether the jurisdiction to grant Mareva orders extends to supporting judgments from inferior courts

There was no evidence of a threat to assets sufficient to justify Mareva relief; the application for Mareva orders was declined.

Order not granted