C-Shirt Pty Ltd v Barnett Marketing & Management Pty Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 1189
Despite the applicant's partial success and arguments about delay and hardship, it is not appropriate to order costs before the determination of damages; costs are therefore reserved until the proceedings are concluded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Liability Determination, Pre Damages Hearing
- Outcome
- costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- ['deceit' 'trade Practices Act S 52 and S 82' 'breach of Contract' 'fiduciary Obligations' 'passing Off' 'injurious Falsehood']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Liability Determination, Pre Damages Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should be ordered immediately following judgment on liability but before damages are determined' 'Whether separation of liability and damages affects the application of Order 62, rule 36A regarding costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the applicant's partial success and arguments about delay and hardship, it is not appropriate to order costs before the determination of damages; costs are therefore reserved until the proceedings are concluded.
Court Disposition
costs reserved
Orders
- ["Costs of the proceedings to date, including this morning's hearing, are reserved."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment