Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 8) [2008] FCA 470

Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 8) [2008] FCA 470

The evidence, including that of Cadbury's experts, did not establish that Darrell Lea had passed off its business or products as those of Cadbury, nor that its use of purple had resulted or would result in a reasonable consumer being misled or deceived within the meaning of ss 52 or 53(c) and (d) of the Trade...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Further Hearing on Remitter After Full Court Appeal; Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'use of Colour in Branding' 'expert Evidence' 'rule in Browne V Dunn' 'brand Reputation']
['trade Practices' 'passing Off' 'evidence'] ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'use of Colour in Branding' 'expert Evidence' 'rule in Browne V Dunn' 'brand Reputation']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Further Hearing on Remitter After Full Court Appeal; Final Judgment

  1. 1 ["Whether Darrell Lea's use of purple in chocolate confectionery amounts to passing off or misleading and deceptive conduct under the Trade Practices Act"]

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence, including that of Cadbury's experts, did not establish that Darrell Lea had passed off its business or products as those of Cadbury, nor that its use of purple had resulted or would result in a reasonable consumer being misled or deceived within the meaning of ss 52 or 53(c) and (d) of the Trade Practices Act; the application was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' 'Questions of costs are adjourned to a date to be fixed.']