Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 210
Leave to appeal should be revoked because proceeding to trial avoids the certainty of wasted costs and allows the case to be resolved efficiently; if the appellate issue becomes relevant, it can be raised on any subsequent appeal after trial.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal revoked, directions for mediation, costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Procedure' 'leave to Appeal' 'case Management']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal; Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be revoked pending trial of the substantive matter']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal should be revoked because proceeding to trial avoids the certainty of wasted costs and allows the case to be resolved efficiently; if the appellate issue becomes relevant, it can be raised on any subsequent appeal after trial.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal revoked, directions for mediation, costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal be revoked.' 'The parties consult with the District Registrar within 14 days to discuss the prospects of mediation.' "Costs of the application for leave to appeal and of today's hearing be costs in the cause."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
62 paragraphs
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 210
CADBURY SCHWEPPES PTY LTD v DARRELL LEA CHOCOLATE SHOPS PTY LTD
VID 732 of 2007
BLACK CJ, EMMETT AND MIDDLETON JJ
2 NOVEMBER 2007
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 732 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PTY LTD
Appellant
AND: DARRELL LEA CHOCOLATE SHOPS PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, EMMETT AND MIDDLETON JJ DATE OF ORDER: 2 NOVEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal be revoked. 2. The parties consult with the District Registrar within 14 days to discuss the prospects of mediation. 3. Costs of the application for leave to appeal and of today's hearing be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 732 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PTY LTD
Appellant
AND: DARRELL LEA CHOCOLATE SHOPS PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, EMMETT AND MIDDLETON JJ
DATE: 2 NOVEMBER 2007
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BLACK CJ 1 The Court considers that leave to appeal should be revoked and that this matter should proceed to trial as quickly as possible. We understand that that can indeed occur and the trial could be completed this year. 2 The reasons essentially are these. If the appeal, as to the merits of which we of course express no opinion at all, were to be argued and were to succeed there is a certainty that the substantial time already spent would be wasted. If, on the other hand, the matter were to proceed to trial the point now in issue may not arise. We do not know. But balancing the two – between the certainty of loss on one hand and the possibility that the matter may not arise on the other – the best course is that the matter proceed to trial. 3 The point has been made. It is either good or bad. When the matter is concluded if it becomes necessary for the point to become the subject of appeal it will no doubt do so. 4 We are strengthened in this conclusion by the acceptance by counsel for the respondent of the risk that would be run by the matter proceeding to trial now rather than the appeal being determined. 5 It is for those reasons that I would revoke leave and direct that arrangements be made for early resumption of the trial. I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Chief Justice Black.
Associate: Dated: 28 July 2008
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 732 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PTY LTD
Appellant
AND: DARRELL LEA CHOCOLATE SHOPS PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, EMMETT AND MIDDLETON JJ
DATE: 2 NOVEMBER 2007
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
EMMETT J 6 I agree that the balancing exercise is between throwing away the costs of the trial to date, which would be a certainty if the appeal proceeds and is upheld, as against the possibility of throwing away the lesser costs of the further trial, which would need to be undertaken if the appeal were dismissed. For those reasons, on balance I agree that leave should be revoked. However, I make it clear that this is without in any way expressing any view as to the merits of the appeal point that has been taken and which would still be open to the appellant in the event that it is unsuccessful after the further hearing. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.
Associate: Dated: 28 July 2008
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 732 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CADBURY SCHWEPPES PTY LTD
Appellant
AND: DARRELL LEA CHOCOLATE SHOPS PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGES: BLACK CJ, EMMETT AND MIDDLETON JJ
DATE: 2 NOVEMBER 2007
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MIDDLETON J 7 I also agree with the proposed orders and the reasons given by the Chief Justice and Emmett J. In addition, I add that I see nothing contrary in taking this approach to the principles enunciated in Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577, and more particularly the comments of Kirby and Crennan JJ at [117]. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Middleton.
Associate: Dated: 28 July 2008 Counsel for the Appellant: Mr N Hutley SC, Mr M Wyles and Mr S Rebikoff
Solicitor for the Appellant: Mallesons Stephen Jaques
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Golvan SC and Mr S Ricketson
Solicitor for the Respondent: Middletons
Date of Hearing: 2 November 2007
Date of Judgment: 2 November 2007