Cairich Property Development Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2018] NSWLEC 1080
The Court, being satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that the decision reached between the parties was one it could properly make, gave effect to the agreement and made final orders without a merit assessment of the original dispute.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and development consent modified in accordance with parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'modification of Consent' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Post Conciliation Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether agreement reached between parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 can be disposed in accordance with the Act' 'Whether the Court could make the agreed decision in the proper exercise of its functions']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 that the decision reached between the parties was one it could properly make, gave effect to the agreement and made final orders without a merit assessment of the original dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and development consent modified in accordance with parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ['Approval is given to the modification of the development consent DA2016/195 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a boarding house containing 52 rooms over one level of basement parking at 10 Homebush Road, Strathfield, Lot 10 in DP 2461 by the deletion of Condition DACC050 and the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment