Calco Surveyors Pty Ltd v Gloucester Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 396
Given the flood risk, limited safe evacuation time, and that the land remains a small island within a high hazard area, approving the development would be inappropriate and contrary to the Flood Plain Management Plan. Precedent and policy also require refusal of the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment (ex Tempore)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'flood Plain Management' 'local Environmental Plans' 'land Use Zoning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment (ex Tempore)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a dwelling house should be approved on flood-affected land classified as high hazard under the Gloucester Flood Plain Management Plan' 'Whether the proposed development satisfies the requirements under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Gloucester LEP 2000' 'Effect of flood hazard classification on assessment of development applications']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the flood risk, limited safe evacuation time, and that the land remains a small island within a high hazard area, approving the development would be inappropriate and contrary to the Flood Plain Management Plan. Precedent and policy also require refusal of the application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal in respect of No. 50 Thunderbolts Way, Gloucester is dismissed.' 'The development application submitted to Gloucester Shire Council is refused.' 'The exhibits, except 4 and 5, are returned to the parties.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment