Blake v Calcorp Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1071
Calcorp was not entitled to an order for payment from the Suitors' Fund because it did not identify the errors of law, those errors were made in the course of granting Calcorp's own application, and Calcorp's counsel expressly agreed with the basis of the Magistrate's reasoning.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Application for Payment From Suitors' Fund Following Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for payment from Suitors' Fund refused
- Legal Topics
- ["suitors' Fund Act" 'indemnity Certificate' 'summary Judgment' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Application for Payment From Suitors' Fund Following Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether defendant is entitled to payment from the Suitors' Fund after summary judgment was set aside on appeal" "Requirements for an indemnity certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
Calcorp was not entitled to an order for payment from the Suitors' Fund because it did not identify the errors of law, those errors were made in the course of granting Calcorp's own application, and Calcorp's counsel expressly agreed with the basis of the Magistrate's reasoning.
Court Disposition
Application for payment from Suitors' Fund refused
Orders
- ["No order made under the Suitors' Fund Act"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment