CAM & SONS PTY LIMITED v SARGENT S7/1940

CAM & SONS PTY LIMITED v SARGENT S7/1940

The substance of the transaction was that of master and servant, and not a partnership, as the alleged hire agreement did not transfer exclusive possession or control of the ship to the crew/partnership; remuneration was a fixed sum and the owners retained authority and control.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Plaintiff: CAM & SONS PTY. LIMITED; Defendant: SARGENT
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 August 1940
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Master and Servant Relationship, Ship Hire Agreements
Employment Law Contract Law Master and Servant Relationship Ship Hire Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CAM & SONS PTY. LIMITED

Plaintiff

SARGENT

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the relationship between the parties was master and servant or otherwise
  2. 2 Whether the agreement constituted a hire or demise of the ship by the partnership

Ratio Decidendi

The substance of the transaction was that of master and servant, and not a partnership, as the alleged hire agreement did not transfer exclusive possession or control of the ship to the crew/partnership; remuneration was a fixed sum and the owners retained authority and control.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed