CAMELO CATENA v GEORGE EDWARD CORNISH [1993] NSWCA 51
The court held that the onus was on the appellant to prove failure by the respondent to mitigate damages concerning future economic loss, and the trial judge's findings that the respondent's prospects of future employment were negligible were justified by the evidence. There was no error in the assessment or allocation of the onus of proof. Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Appellant: Camelo Catena; Respondent: George Edward Cornish
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Economic Loss, Future Earning Capacity, Mitigation of Loss, Onus of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camelo Catena
Appellant
George Edward Cornish
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in the assessment of damages for future economic loss by misallocating the onus of proof regarding mitigation and future employment prospects
- 2 Whether the respondent had discharged his onus of proving loss of earning capacity
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the onus was on the appellant to prove failure by the respondent to mitigate damages concerning future economic loss, and the trial judge's findings that the respondent's prospects of future employment were negligible were justified by the evidence. There was no error in the assessment or allocation of the onus of proof. Appeal dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment