Thomas v Shaw [No 3] [2009] NSWSC 1419
The plaintiff's injuries, including brain damage and impaired judgment, made him incapable of managing his affairs at present and the incapacity would probably continue until about age 25. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the claimed funds management costs, including pre-18 trustee fees, and the unopposed slip rule correction for future superannuation was accepted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Negligence Proceeding Involving Funds Management for an Infant Plaintiff / Consequential Orders After Judgment, With Reserved Issue of Funds Management and Slip Rule Adjustment
- Outcome
- Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount set out in the judgment of 26 June 2009 as adjusted by this judgment; defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs as previously ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['funds Management' 'infant Claim' 'brain Damage' 'incapacity to Manage Affairs' 'future Superannuation Adjustment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Negligence Proceeding Involving Funds Management for an Infant Plaintiff / Consequential Orders After Judgment, With Reserved Issue of Funds Management and Slip Rule Adjustment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an allowance should be made for funds management costs before the plaintiff turns 18 years old.' 'Whether the plaintiff is likely to be incapable of managing his affairs after turning 18 and until about age 25.' 'Whether the damages calculation should be amended under the slip rule for future superannuation calculated on gross income.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's injuries, including brain damage and impaired judgment, made him incapable of managing his affairs at present and the incapacity would probably continue until about age 25. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the claimed funds management costs, including pre-18 trustee fees, and the unopposed slip rule correction for future superannuation was accepted.
Court Disposition
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount set out in the judgment of 26 June 2009 as adjusted by this judgment; defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs as previously ordered.
Orders
- ['I order that there should be a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the amount set out in the judgment of 26 June 2009 (para [314]) as adjusted by this judgment.' "I have previously ordered that the defendants should pay the plaintiff's costs in accordance with the judgment Thomas v Shaw No. 2...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment