Campanella Holdings Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2022] NSWLEC 1057
The parties agreed to the grant of development consent for the subdivision application following resolution of Council’s contentions, and the Court is satisfied this is a lawful and proper exercise of its functions and orders accordingly under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Development Application Refusal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'subdivision' 'appeal' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Development Application Refusal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for the two-lot residential subdivision at 2 Tennyson Road, Concord' 'Whether the proposed subdivision complies with planning instruments and statutory requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties agreed to the grant of development consent for the subdivision application following resolution of Council’s contentions, and the Court is satisfied this is a lawful and proper exercise of its functions and orders accordingly under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA2021/0083, for the Torrens Title subdivision of the land described as Lot 1 DP 214636 (known as 2 Tennyson Road, Concord) into 2 lots, subject to the conditions in Annexure A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment