Campbell v Kitchen and Sons Ltd and Brisbane Soap Co Ltd [1910] HCA 23
Where a company is unable to resolve to file an appeal due to an equally divided board, the court may allow a shareholder with a substantial interest to pursue the appeal, applying the analogy to Chancery practice.
- Parties
- Applicant: Campbell; Respondent: J. Kitchen & Sons Ltd.; Respondent: Brisbane Soap Co. Ltd.; Shareholder: Peter Morrison Campbell; Director: John Clark Donaldson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Institute and Carry on an Appeal to the High Court From Supreme Court of Queensland
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the applicant to appeal on behalf of himself and all other members of the company, with the defendant company to be made a respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Shareholder Rights, Corporate Deadlock
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Campbell
Applicant
J. Kitchen & Sons Ltd.
Respondent
Brisbane Soap Co. Ltd.
Respondent
Peter Morrison Campbell
Shareholder
John Clark Donaldson
Director
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Institute and Carry on an Appeal to the High Court From Supreme Court of Queensland
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a shareholder can be granted leave to appeal on behalf of a company when the company’s directors are deadlocked
- 2 Whether the analogy to Court of Chancery practice allowing interested persons to appeal applies
Ratio Decidendi
Where a company is unable to resolve to file an appeal due to an equally divided board, the court may allow a shareholder with a substantial interest to pursue the appeal, applying the analogy to Chancery practice.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the applicant to appeal on behalf of himself and all other members of the company, with the defendant company to be made a respondent.
Orders
- Leave given to applicant to institute and carry on an appeal to the High Court from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Queensland, in the name of the company, with the company as respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment