Canangles Creek Pastoral Co. Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2009] NSWLEC 1023
Having considered the evidence, objections, council assessment, support letters and the absence of police objection, the Court was satisfied that there was no compelling evidence that patrons of the Annandale Hotel caused material disamenity, unsatisfactory parking impacts or rubbish impacts sufficient to reject the additional one hour trading period, and that appropriate consent orders could be made subject to further conditions addressing matters raised by objectors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- S 96 AA Application to Modify Conditions of Consent / Ex Tempore Judgment on Modification Application; Matter Stood Over for Mention With Parties Directed to File and Serve Updated Draft Orders/conditions
- Outcome
- Modification supported; appropriate consent orders could be granted subject to agreed conditions, and the parties were directed to file and serve updated draft orders/conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['section 96 Modification' 'late Night Trading Hours' 'hotel Operations' 'amenity Impacts' 'antisocial Behaviour' 'traffic and Parking' 'rubbish' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
S 96 AA Application to Modify Conditions of Consent / Ex Tempore Judgment on Modification Application; Matter Stood Over for Mention With Parties Directed to File and Serve Updated Draft Orders/conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conditions of consent for the Annandale Hotel should be modified to make permanent extended trading hours from 12 midnight to 1am on Thursday, Friday and Saturday.' 'Whether antisocial behaviour, parking impacts, rubbish or other amenity impacts warranted refusal of the additional one hour trading period.' 'Whether further conditions were required to address complaints, security response arrangements and neighbourhood meetings.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having considered the evidence, objections, council assessment, support letters and the absence of police objection, the Court was satisfied that there was no compelling evidence that patrons of the Annandale Hotel caused material disamenity, unsatisfactory parking impacts or rubbish impacts sufficient to reject the additional one hour trading period, and that appropriate consent orders could be made subject to further conditions addressing matters raised by objectors.
Court Disposition
Modification supported; appropriate consent orders could be granted subject to agreed conditions, and the parties were directed to file and serve updated draft orders/conditions.
Orders
- ['The parties are to file and serve updated draft orders/conditions by the next Thursday.' 'The matter is stood over for mention at 9.30am on Monday 2 February 2009.' 'The hours of operation include Thursday, Friday and Saturday from 10:00am to 1:00am the following morning, subject to conditions.' 'The outdoor beer...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment