Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Andreasen [2005] NSWSC 1157
There was a binding three-year contract and an implied term requiring defendants to purchase all coffee supplies from the plaintiff; there was no term requiring plaintiff to supply umbrellas; defendants breached the contract and are liable for damages representing lost profits for the remainder of the contract term.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Breach of Contract / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants liable for damages for breach of contract.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction and Interpretation of Contracts' 'implied Terms' 'business Efficacy' 'breach of Contract' 'damages']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Breach of Contract / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the contract for a term of three years or terminable at will?' 'Was it a term of the contract that the defendants would, while it continued, buy all their coffee supplies from the plaintiff?' 'Was there a fundamental term that the plaintiff would supply the defendants with four large outdoor umbrellas?' 'Are the defendants liable to the plaintiff in damages?' 'What is the quantum of such damages?']
Ratio Decidendi
There was a binding three-year contract and an implied term requiring defendants to purchase all coffee supplies from the plaintiff; there was no term requiring plaintiff to supply umbrellas; defendants breached the contract and are liable for damages representing lost profits for the remainder of the contract term.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants liable for damages for breach of contract.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff awarded damages of $60,327.80 for lost profit.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment