NFM [2018] NSWCATGD 14
The Tribunal, applying the requisite legal test for capacity, found that Mrs NFM did not possess the capacity in early 2017 to validly execute or revoke enduring guardianship or enduring power of attorney instruments; accordingly, the 2017 instruments appointing or revoking appointments were not effective. The Tribunal further determined that due to Mrs NFM's cognitive disability and the family dynamics, it was in her best interests that guardianship and financial management orders be made, appointing the Public Guardian and DAT as guardians (for separate functions), and committing management of her estate to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Guardianship and Financial Management Applications; Review of Enduring Guardianship and Powers of Attorney / Final Merits Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Guardianship order and financial management order made; appointments confirmed and prior appointment revoked
- Legal Topics
- ['capacity to Appoint or Revoke Enduring Guardian' 'capacity to Appoint or Revoke Enduring Power of Attorney' 'criteria for Guardianship Order' 'criteria for Financial Management Order' 'appointment of Public Guardian' 'appointment of Financial Manager' 'assessment of Medical Evidence of Incapacity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Guardianship and Financial Management Applications; Review of Enduring Guardianship and Powers of Attorney / Final Merits Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mrs NFM possessed the requisite capacity to execute, revoke or appoint enduring guardians and attorneys in early 2017' 'Whether a guardianship order should be made in respect of Mrs NFM and who should be the guardian' 'Whether a financial management order should be made in respect of Mrs NFM and who should be financial manager']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal, applying the requisite legal test for capacity, found that Mrs NFM did not possess the capacity in early 2017 to validly execute or revoke enduring guardianship or enduring power of attorney instruments; accordingly, the 2017 instruments appointing or revoking appointments were not effective. The Tribunal further determined that due to Mrs NFM's cognitive disability and the family dynamics, it was in her best interests that guardianship and financial management orders be made, appointing the Public Guardian and DAT as guardians (for separate functions), and committing management of her estate to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Court Disposition
Guardianship order and financial management order made; appointments confirmed and prior appointment revoked
Orders
- ['The appointment of DAT as an enduring guardian is revoked.' 'A guardianship order is made for NFM.' 'The Public Guardian and DAT are appointed separately as guardians for different functions for NFM for 12 months.' "Conditions as to guardians' role set out (including consultation and obtaining NFM's views)." 'The...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment