Capel Finance Ltd [2005] NSWSC 522

Capel Finance Ltd [2005] NSWSC 522

The scheme was approved because the statutory voting requirement was clearly satisfied, ASIC had issued a s.411(17)(b) letter, the required special resolutions for the reduction of capital had been passed, there was no opposition, and the timing contraventions of s.412(6) and s.256C(5) were procedural irregularities that caused no prejudice and did not justify refusing approval.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Corporations Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Capital / Application Under S.411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Approval of a Scheme of Arrangement After the Scheme Meeting
Outcome
Scheme of arrangement approved.
Legal Topics
['scheme of Arrangement' 'reduction of Capital' 'asic Lodgment and Registration Requirements' 'procedural Irregularities' 'court Approval Under S.411(4)(b)']
['corporations Law'] ['scheme of Arrangement' 'reduction of Capital' 'asic Lodgment and Registration Requirements' 'procedural Irregularities' 'court Approval Under S.411(4)(b)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Capital / Application Under S.411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Approval of a Scheme of Arrangement After the Scheme Meeting

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the scheme of arrangement should be approved under s.411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether timing non-compliance with s.412(6) and s.256C(5) affected approval of the scheme.' 'Whether the non-compliances caused prejudice or were procedural irregularities.' 'Whether entry of the approving orders should be delayed until expiry of the 14-day period under s.256C(3).']

Ratio Decidendi

The scheme was approved because the statutory voting requirement was clearly satisfied, ASIC had issued a s.411(17)(b) letter, the required special resolutions for the reduction of capital had been passed, there was no opposition, and the timing contraventions of s.412(6) and s.256C(5) were procedural irregularities that caused no prejudice and did not justify refusing approval.

Court Disposition

Scheme of arrangement approved.

Orders

  • ["Order that the scheme of arrangement between the plaintiff and certain of its members which is annexed to the short minutes and marked 'A' be and is hereby approved." 'Order that the plaintiff be exempt from compliance with s.411(11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in relation to the said scheme of...