Capilano Honey Ltd v Mulvany [2017] NSWSC 833
Given the defendant's unrepresented status and the arguable case that interlocutory orders may unduly constrain his entitlement to discuss a matter of public interest, the Court considers it appropriate to refer Mr Mulvany to the registrar for pro bono legal assistance pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36, in relation to his notice of motion to vary the injunction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Defendant referred to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'pro Bono Legal Assistance' 'variation of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether interlocutory orders restraining publication should be varied to permit the defendant to discuss the nature of the claim for fundraising purposes' "Desirability of obtaining pro bono legal assistance for the defendant's application"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendant's unrepresented status and the arguable case that interlocutory orders may unduly constrain his entitlement to discuss a matter of public interest, the Court considers it appropriate to refer Mr Mulvany to the registrar for pro bono legal assistance pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 7.36, in relation to his notice of motion to vary the injunction.
Court Disposition
Defendant referred to the Registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the pro bono panel for legal assistance
Orders
- ['Mr Mulvany referred to the registrar for referral to a barrister or solicitor on the Pro Bono Panel for legal assistance confined to advice in relation to his notice of motion to vary the injunction and representation at the hearing of that motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment