Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd v Director-General of the Department of Planning [2010] NSWLEC 5
The transitional provision defining 'pending LEP' must be construed as referring to Section 64, not Section 54, of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Therefore, the Director-General had no power to issue a certificate under the repealed provisions because the draft LEP was not received under s 64...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd ACN 080 711 191; First Respondent: Director-General of the Department of Planning; Second Respondent: Queanbeyan City Council; Third Respondent: Canberra Estates Consortium No 4 Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; certificate declared invalid; costs awarded to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Planning Instruments, Transitional Provisions, Statutory Interpretation, Legislative Intent, Decision Without Power, Planning Regime Amendments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Capital Airport Group Pty Ltd ACN 080 711 191
Applicant
Director-General of the Department of Planning
First Respondent
Queanbeyan City Council
Second Respondent
Canberra Estates Consortium No 4 Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Director-General had power to issue a s 65 certificate under repealed provisions
- 2 Interpretation of transitional provisions and 'pending LEP' definition
- 3 Legislative intent and construction of Section 54 versus Section 64
Ratio Decidendi
The transitional provision defining 'pending LEP' must be construed as referring to Section 64, not Section 54, of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Therefore, the Director-General had no power to issue a certificate under the repealed provisions because the draft LEP was not received under s 64 before 1 July 2009. The issued certificate was therefore invalid and made in excess of power.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; certificate declared invalid; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- Declaration that the decision to issue a s 65 certificate was made in excess of power.
- Declaration that the certificate issued under s 65(1) is invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment