Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd v Lesslie [2022] NSWCATAP 182
There was no evidence presented of procedural unfairness or bias, and the appellant did not provide transcript or sound recording as instructed; the Tribunal correctly applied relevant principles and reached findings on available evidence. Leave to appeal was refused on all other grounds and the original order stands.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd; Respondent: Barbra Lesslie
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Warranty, Acceptable Quality, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Leave to Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd
Appellant
Barbra Lesslie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether Tribunal failed to afford procedural fairness to appellant
- 2 whether Tribunal was biased in favour of respondent
- 3 whether additional remedy options not considered warranted leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence presented of procedural unfairness or bias, and the appellant did not provide transcript or sound recording as instructed; the Tribunal correctly applied relevant principles and reached findings on available evidence. Leave to appeal was refused on all other grounds and the original order stands.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused
Orders
- In relation to any questions of law, the appeal is dismissed.
- In relation to any other errors, leave to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment