Elliott v Kotsopoulos [2009] NSWDC 164

Elliott v Kotsopoulos [2009] NSWDC 164

The court found on the evidence that the defendant was responsible for two violent assaults against the plaintiff, causing significant physical, psychological, and financial harm. Common law principles of tort, rather than the Civil Liability Act 2002, governed the assessment of damages, and the plaintiff was entitled to compensatory, aggravated, and exemplary damages due to the egregiousness of the assaults and their life-altering consequences.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
['assault and Battery' 'damages' 'exemplary Damages' 'aggravated Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment

  1. 1 ['Assessment of damages for intentional torts of assault and battery' 'Whether exemplary and aggravated damages should be awarded']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found on the evidence that the defendant was responsible for two violent assaults against the plaintiff, causing significant physical, psychological, and financial harm. Common law principles of tort, rather than the Civil Liability Act 2002, governed the assessment of damages, and the plaintiff was entitled to compensatory, aggravated, and exemplary damages due to the egregiousness of the assaults and their life-altering consequences.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • ['Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $324,549' "Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs" 'Exhibits may be returned' "Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further orders are required"]