Law and Anor v Valuer General [2008] NSWLEC 1449
The applicant did not discharge the onus under section 40 (2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916. The Court accepted Mr Kenny's valuation evidence, including his adjustments to the deduced land values of the inspected comparable sales and his check against the residential potential for four townhouses, and found that a Land Value of $378,000 was justified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Land Value Assessment Under the Valuation of Land Act 1916 / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Land Value confirmed at $378,000; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['land Value Assessment' 'comparable Sales Analysis' 'highest and Best Use' 'onus of Proof on Appeal' 'campbelltown Zoning Controls']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Land Value Assessment Under the Valuation of Land Act 1916 / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Land Value assessed for 138 Thunderbolt Drive, Raby, as at the Base Date of 1 July 2006 should be reduced from $378,000.' "Whether the applicant discharged the onus of proving the applicant's case under section 40 (2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916." "Whether the respondent's comparable sales analysis and adjustments justified the assessed Land Value."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not discharge the onus under section 40 (2) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916. The Court accepted Mr Kenny's valuation evidence, including his adjustments to the deduced land values of the inspected comparable sales and his check against the residential potential for four townhouses, and found that a Land Value of $378,000 was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Land Value confirmed at $378,000; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The Land Value of 138 Thunderbolt Drive, Raby, at the Base Date of 1 July 2006, is confirmed at $378,000.' 'No Order is made as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment