Payne v Haski [2018] NSWCATAD 115
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under the cited statutes to grant relief sought by the applicant, as the proceedings were not initiated by a designated local regulatory authority and the applicant was not a consumer under the relevant legal profession legislation. Therefore, the application is lacking in substance and must be struck out under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application to the Tribunal / Dismissal Application Under S 55(1)(b) of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'dismissal for Want of Jurisdiction' 'professional Conduct of Solicitors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to the Tribunal / Dismissal Application Under S 55(1)(b) of Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant monetary compensation or disciplinary orders against the respondents as sought by the applicant' "Whether the applicant's claim is misconceived or lacking in substance within the meaning of s 55(1)(b) of the CAT Act"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction under the cited statutes to grant relief sought by the applicant, as the proceedings were not initiated by a designated local regulatory authority and the applicant was not a consumer under the relevant legal profession legislation. Therefore, the application is lacking in substance and must be struck out under s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- ['The Tribunal orders that the application be struck out pursuant to s 55(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 No 2 (NSW)']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment