Carlewie Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 78
The acquired land was to be valued primarily by capitalising market rent from continued industrial use, including hardstand/yard areas, because the asserted separate development value of the north-eastern and south-western portions was constrained by heritage significance, planning controls, the local road proposal, the need for development consent, the fire safety order, contamination risks and the existing lease circumstances. The Court accepted a 7% capitalisation rate, adopted rental values for hardstand and tenancies, deducted appropriate capital adjustments for DADI profit rental, essential heritage works, fire order compliance, contamination and demolition, rejected the land tax...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 3 Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Objection Under the Land Acquisition (just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 / Principal Judgment Determining Compensation
- Outcome
- Compensation determined for the Applicant in the amount of $23,277,688.96; costs reserved; exhibits may be returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['just Terms Compensation' 'market Value' 'disturbance' 'industrial Land Valuation' 'heritage Listed Warehouses' 'fire Safety Order Compliance' 'contamination and Underground Storage Tanks' 'land Tax Adjustment' 'development Potential']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 3 Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Objection Under the Land Acquisition (just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 / Principal Judgment Determining Compensation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What market value should be attributed to the acquired industrial land as at the date of acquisition.' 'Whether potential developable areas in the north-eastern and south-western portions should be valued as development land or as hardstand/yard areas.' 'What deductions or adjustments should be made for heritage conservation works, fire safety order compliance, contamination and demolition costs.' 'Whether land tax paid by the Applicant should be included in market value.' 'Whether replacement property costs, including stamp duty, conveyancing costs and financial costs, were compensable as disturbance.' 'How the Court should resolve competing expert opinion evidence in the valuation exercise.']
Ratio Decidendi
The acquired land was to be valued primarily by capitalising market rent from continued industrial use, including hardstand/yard areas, because the asserted separate development value of the north-eastern and south-western portions was constrained by heritage significance, planning controls, the local road proposal, the need for development consent, the fire safety order, contamination risks and the existing lease circumstances. The Court accepted a 7% capitalisation rate, adopted rental values for hardstand and tenancies, deducted appropriate capital adjustments for DADI profit rental, essential heritage works, fire order compliance, contamination and demolition, rejected the land tax...
Court Disposition
Compensation determined for the Applicant in the amount of $23,277,688.96; costs reserved; exhibits may be returned.
Orders
- ["Compensation for the compulsory acquisition by the Respondent of the Applicant's property known as 53-55 Campbell Street and 33 Burrows Road, St Peters, being lot 101 in DP 845651 and lot 102 DP 871150, on 3 July 2015, is determined in the amount of $23,277,688.96, pursuant to the Land Acquisition (Just Terms...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment