Carmody v FC Lovelock Pty Ltd [1970] HCA 35
Duties imposed under s.7 of the Customs Tariff (Dumping and Subsidies) Act 1961 are duties of customs within the meaning of the Constitution, validly imposed even retrospectively on goods already entered for home consumption and the importer is liable for payment. The Minister must be satisfied after inquiry and report by the Tariff Board, but is not bound to rely solely on the Board's findings. The Act does not infringe constitutional restrictions under s.55 or s.90, and the statutory scheme allows recovery of the dumping duty from importers in these circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Demurrer
- Outcome
- Demurrer to the declaration (as amended) overruled; demurrer to defendant's pleas allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['imposition of Dumping Duties' 'statutory Construction' 'retrospective Operation of Customs Duties' 'ministerial Power' 'incorporation of Customs Act' 'constitutional Validity of Customs Duty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Demurrer
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Customs Tariff (Dumping and Subsidies) Act 1961 permits the imposition of dumping duties retrospectively on goods already entered for home consumption, or even consumed' "Whether the Minister's satisfaction following inquiry and report by the Tariff Board is a condition precedent to the exercise of ministerial power under s.7" 'Whether the Act infringes s. 55 of the Constitution' 'Whether a dumping duty imposed after goods are entered for home consumption is a duty of customs within s. 90 of the Constitution' 'Who is liable to pay the dumping duty under the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Duties imposed under s.7 of the Customs Tariff (Dumping and Subsidies) Act 1961 are duties of customs within the meaning of the Constitution, validly imposed even retrospectively on goods already entered for home consumption and the importer is liable for payment. The Minister must be satisfied after inquiry and report by the Tariff Board, but is not bound to rely solely on the Board's findings. The Act does not infringe constitutional restrictions under s.55 or s.90, and the statutory scheme allows recovery of the dumping duty from importers in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Demurrer to the declaration (as amended) overruled; demurrer to defendant's pleas allowed
Orders
- ['Leave to amend generally' "Defendant to pay one half of plaintiff's costs of the demurrers"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment