Muddle v Cormie [2017] NSWSC 1581
Ms Muddle's liability as guarantor was not in issue at trial due to her counsel's concessions, and it was not in the interests of justice to allow her to re-agitate this issue on appeal; the guarantee was supported by consideration supplied by the Cormies' post-execution deliveries of grain on credit, making it enforceable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['guarantee' 'consideration' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs' 'admissions' 'contractual Liability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Ms Muddle's liability under the guarantee was an issue at trial" 'Whether it was open to Ms Muddle to agitate the enforceability of the guarantee on appeal' 'Whether the guarantee was supported by consideration and is enforceable']
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Muddle's liability as guarantor was not in issue at trial due to her counsel's concessions, and it was not in the interests of justice to allow her to re-agitate this issue on appeal; the guarantee was supported by consideration supplied by the Cormies' post-execution deliveries of grain on credit, making it enforceable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Extend the time for filing the summons to 9 June 2017.' 'To the extent required, grant leave to the plaintiff to appeal.' 'Appeal dismissed.' "Unless any party makes an application in writing, with any evidence in support, to my Associate within seven days hereof for a different order, order the plaintiff to pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment