Bentley v Hinchen & anor [2014] NSWLEC 1209
Given the further damage from falling limbs and effects of root/stem growth, the jurisdictional test under the Act is satisfied; however, as the tree remains healthy and structurally sound, removal is not justified. Appropriate relief is orders for pruning, continued deadwood removal, notification requirements, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 / Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part.
- Legal Topics
- ['damage to Property' 'pruning Orders' 'compensation' 'neighbour Disputes']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 / Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether further orders should be made for pruning or removal of the respondents' tree under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006" 'Whether compensation should be ordered for property damage since previous proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the further damage from falling limbs and effects of root/stem growth, the jurisdictional test under the Act is satisfied; however, as the tree remains healthy and structurally sound, removal is not justified. Appropriate relief is orders for pruning, continued deadwood removal, notification requirements, and reasonable compensation for specific property repairs.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part.
Orders
- ["Respondents to engage and pay for a qualified arborist to prune four longest limbs above applicant's property by 14 December 2014." 'Respondents to continue regular deadwood removal per previous orders (30mm diameter and above) at intervals not exceeding 12 months, by qualified arborists.' "Respondents must...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment