Application by Carolyn June Enright for an Order Nisi for a writ of Certiorari [1982] FCA 127
The appeal is dismissed as the applicant failed to utilise the appeal or review rights within the applicable time limit; no exceptional or unusual circumstances warranted the discretionary grant of certiorari on the basis of a mere error of law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Carolyn June Enright
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certiorari, Prerogative Writs, Availability of Remedies, Traffic Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
Carolyn June Enright
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order nisi for a writ of certiorari should be granted to quash a decision of the Court of Petty Sessions regarding an offence under the Traffic (Amendment) Ordinance 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed as the applicant failed to utilise the appeal or review rights within the applicable time limit; no exceptional or unusual circumstances warranted the discretionary grant of certiorari on the basis of a mere error of law.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment