Townsend v Townsend [2001] NSWCA 136
The majority found that the appellant had not established on the balance of probabilities that the respondent deliberately injured her; the medical and factual evidence presented sufficient doubts and alternative explanations consistent with accidental injury, supporting the trial judge's decision to dismiss the claim.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['intentional Tort' 'assault' 'personal Injury' 'causation' 'evidence Admissibility' 'contributory Negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant's injury was caused by deliberate conduct of the respondent" 'Whether the trial judge erred in assessing the facts and expert evidence' 'Admissibility of tendency evidence' 'Whether further evidence should be received on appeal' 'Contributory negligence']
Ratio Decidendi
The majority found that the appellant had not established on the balance of probabilities that the respondent deliberately injured her; the medical and factual evidence presented sufficient doubts and alternative explanations consistent with accidental injury, supporting the trial judge's decision to dismiss the claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment