Carr v Minister for Land and Water Conservation [2000] NSWLEC 89
The Court found that the clearing proposed in the development application would have a significant and unacceptable impact on the conservation value of the site and habitat of threatened species. Since the development consent granted was significantly different from the development applied for, it was not open to the Minister to grant such a consent. The development application was refused on the merits.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'clearing Native Vegetation' 'conditions on Development Consent' 'appeal Proceedings' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Minister could grant development consent significantly different from what was applied for' 'Impact on conservation value of site' 'Economic benefit of clearing' 'Requirement for Species Impact Statement']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the clearing proposed in the development application would have a significant and unacceptable impact on the conservation value of the site and habitat of threatened species. Since the development consent granted was significantly different from the development applied for, it was not open to the Minister to grant such a consent. The development application was refused on the merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application No TR9901 for the clearing of native vegetation on part of lot 44 DP 753205 is determined by the refusal of consent.' 'The exhibits may be returned.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment