Arambatzis v Foundas (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1530
Ms Foundas' urgent application to stay the writ of possession failed due to absence of satisfactory justification, lack of notice to other parties, absence of coherent or relevant grounds, and previous unsuccessful attempts at stay; hardship did not entitle continued occupation.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Peter Arambatzis; Defendant: Cassiani Foundas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Writ of Possession / Ex Tempore Judgment on Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Application refused; filing not permitted without leave.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Trustees for Sale, Stay of Execution, Writ of Possession
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Arambatzis
First Plaintiff
Cassiani Foundas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Writ of Possession / Ex Tempore Judgment on Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution of the writ of possession should be stayed
- 2 Whether proper grounds exist for ex parte stay
- 3 Whether hardship alleged by defendant justifies grant of stay
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Foundas' urgent application to stay the writ of possession failed due to absence of satisfactory justification, lack of notice to other parties, absence of coherent or relevant grounds, and previous unsuccessful attempts at stay; hardship did not entitle continued occupation.
Court Disposition
Application refused; filing not permitted without leave.
Orders
- Direct that no further application with respect to the stay or setting aside of the writ of possession issued on 15 April 2024 be filed without the prior leave of a Judge of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment