Castle Constructions Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [2007] NSWLEC 563
Because the applicant succeeded on the invalidity issue due to a new point founded by a related Court of Appeal judgment, yet was unsuccessful on a discrete aspect consuming about 20% of the hearing/preparation time, it is appropriate to award 80% of costs to the applicant and not dissect relatively minor matters.
- Parties
- Applicant: Castle Constructions Pty Ltd; Respondent: North Sydney Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Relief and Costs
- Outcome
- Declarations made as agreed, respondent to pay 80% of applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Form of Relief, Costs Apportionment, Invalidity of Planning Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Castle Constructions Pty Ltd
Applicant
North Sydney Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Relief and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate form of relief regarding invalid planning instrument
- 2 Apportionment of costs when the successful applicant was unsuccessful on a discrete issue
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicant succeeded on the invalidity issue due to a new point founded by a related Court of Appeal judgment, yet was unsuccessful on a discrete aspect consuming about 20% of the hearing/preparation time, it is appropriate to award 80% of costs to the applicant and not dissect relatively minor matters.
Court Disposition
Declarations made as agreed, respondent to pay 80% of applicant's costs.
Orders
- Declares section 1.1.fa and the map marked Building Height Map - North Sydney CBD and figure 20.3 in the North Sydney Development Control Plan 2002 are invalid and ineffective.
- Declares that the notional arcs depicted in figures 1.1 and 1.2 showing stepping down of building heights are reinstated together with the reference thereto in section 1.1.h.i.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment