Plumton v Cathay Hotel Pty Ltd [1987] FCA 616
The Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Plumton was a 'delegate of an organisation' for the purposes of s.5(1) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904; nor that union membership, or status as delegate or proposed delegate, or dissatisfaction with conditions as a member of a union seeking better...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Christopher Plumton; Defendant: Cathay Hotel Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under Statute / Judgment
- Outcome
- information dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal of Employee, Union Delegate Status, Industrial Organisations, Employment Termination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Plumton
Prosecutor
Cathay Hotel Pty. Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under Statute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of Christopher Plumton was by reason of his status as a delegate, proposed delegate, or member of a union contrary to s.5(1) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 2 Meaning of 'delegate' under s.5(1) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 3 Whether Plumton was a delegate appointed in accordance with union rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Plumton was a 'delegate of an organisation' for the purposes of s.5(1) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904; nor that union membership, or status as delegate or proposed delegate, or dissatisfaction with conditions as a member of a union seeking better conditions, was a substantial and operative factor in his dismissal.
Court Disposition
information dismissed
Orders
- the information be dismissed
- grant liberty to apply within 7 days on the question of costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment