Catherine Robertson v Joshua Liebmann [2015] NSWDC 231

Catherine Robertson v Joshua Liebmann [2015] NSWDC 231

The defendant breached his duty of care by failing to maintain vigilant observation as he reversed his vehicle in an area where pedestrians could be expected, causing foreseeable injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was contributorily negligent by not continuously observing the defendant’s vehicle when crossing, warranting a 20% reduction in damages. The plaintiff was awarded damages for her injuries, care needs, and economic loss, less 20% for contributory negligence.

Parties
Plaintiff: Catherine Robertson; Defendant: Joshua Liebmann
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff, damages awarded with reduction for contributory negligence.
Legal Topics
Liability, Contributory Negligence, Assessment of Damages
Tort Motor Accident Compensation Liability Contributory Negligence Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Robertson

Plaintiff

Joshua Liebmann

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the defendant negligent in reversing his vehicle and causing injury to the plaintiff?
  2. 2 Did the plaintiff contribute to her own injury through contributory negligence?
  3. 3 What is the appropriate assessment of damages for the plaintiff's injuries, including past and future care and economic loss?

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant breached his duty of care by failing to maintain vigilant observation as he reversed his vehicle in an area where pedestrians could be expected, causing foreseeable injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was contributorily negligent by not continuously observing the defendant’s vehicle when crossing, warranting a 20% reduction in damages. The plaintiff was awarded damages for her injuries, care needs, and economic loss, less 20% for contributory negligence.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff, damages awarded with reduction for contributory negligence.

Orders

  • Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $161,832.00.
  • The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings.