Australia Judgment

CATTANACH V. PENDERGAST AND OTHERS 1/1964

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

appeal struck out by consent

Court disposition

appeal struck out by consent

Orders

  • Appeal be struck out by consent
  • The sum of fifty pounds (£50.0.0) paid into the Registry of the Court by the Appellant as security for costs of the Appeal be paid to Leonard Power & Power, solicitors, Town Agents for J.R. Cary solicitor for the Appellant

02

Material facts

Parties

Daphne Pearl Cattanach

Appellant Counsel: Mr. Mylne

Patrick Percival Pendergast

Respondent Counsel: Mr. O'Sullivan

Robert James Moreland

Respondent

Edgar David Laws

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Security for Costs of the Appeal: GBP 50

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal

04

Ratio, limits and disposition

Court disposition

appeal struck out by consent

  • Appeal be struck out by consent
  • The sum of fifty pounds (£50.0.0) paid into the Registry of the Court by the Appellant as security for costs of the Appeal be paid to Leonard Power & Power, solicitors, Town Agents for J.R. Cary solicitor for the Appellant

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA "

QUEENSLAND REGT SPRY @ >: —_ Appeal No, 1 of 19)

ON APPEAL FROM (Hi FULL COURT OF THE

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

BELWERN:

DAPHNY PBARL CACTANACH CP Laintife

Appellant and

PATRICK Pi

ROBERT JAME

WDGAR DAVID Defendants)

Respondents

JUDGMENT |

if)

PSL5 47.

~ DMO 1EB4 BRISBANE REGISTRY.

WONDAT town Agents ;-

LEONARD POWER & POWER Solicitors

Metropolitan Life Building yueen jtreet

Brisbane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND REGISTRY Appeal No, 1 of 1964

BETWEEN:

DAPHNE PEARL CATTANACH Plaintiff Appellant and

PATRICK PERCIVAL PENDERGAST

ROBERT JAMES MORELAND and

EDGAR DAVID LAWS

Defendants )

Respondents

ON APPEAL FHOM THE FULL COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT

BEFORE THEIR HONOURS - THE CHIEF JUSTICE (SIR GARFIELD BARWICK), MR. JUSTICE KITTO, MR. JUSTICE TAYLOR, MR. JUSTICE

WINDEYEH, MR. JUSTICE OWEN

BRISBANE, WEDNESDAY THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, 1964

THIS APPEAL coming on to be mentioned before the Court this day at Brisbane UPON APPLICATION made by Mr. Mylne of Counsel on behalf of the Appellant that the said Appeal by consent be struck out and UPON HEARING Mr. O'Sullivan of Counsel for the Respondents BY CONSENT fHIs COURT DOTH ORDER that the Appeal be struck out AND the sum of FIFTY POUNDS (£50.0.0) paid into the Registry of this Honourable Court by the Appellant as security for the costs of the Appeal be paid to LEONARD POWER & POWER, Solicitors, Town Agents for J.R. CARY Solicitor for the Appellant.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.