Cavestock Group Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 208

Cavestock Group Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 208

Applicant had a good arguable case and risked being unable to recover funds if successful without a freezing order. Council's mixing and pooling of funds, and refusal to undertake to refund any excess, created a risk that judgment would be unsatisfied, justifying interlocutory relief under Rule 25.11.

Parties
Applicant: Cavestock Group Pty Ltd; Respondent: Minister for Planning; Respondent on the Notice of Motion: Newcastle City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Freezing Order
Outcome
Freezing order granted; costs reserved
Legal Topics
Freezing Orders, Section 94 Contributions, Interlocutory Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cavestock Group Pty Ltd

Applicant

Minister for Planning

Respondent

Newcastle City Council

Respondent on the Notice of Motion

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Freezing Order

  1. 1 Whether a freezing order should be made restraining Newcastle City Council from dealing with funds obtained by bank guarantee pending determination of underlying appeal concerning Section 94 contributions

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant had a good arguable case and risked being unable to recover funds if successful without a freezing order. Council's mixing and pooling of funds, and refusal to undertake to refund any excess, created a risk that judgment would be unsatisfied, justifying interlocutory relief under Rule 25.11.

Court Disposition

Freezing order granted; costs reserved

Orders

  • Until further order, Newcastle City Council restrained from transferring, disposing of, or dealing with money obtained under bank guarantee called on 23 June 2008.
  • Applicant granted liberty to apply on 48 hours' notice regarding Order 2 sought in Notice of Motion filed 4 July 2008.