CBG v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 274
The applicant, having been convicted of multiple serious offences of indecent assault against his 10- and 11-year-old daughter, failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that he poses a risk to the safety of children; therefore, the decision to refuse a Working with Children Check clearance must be affirmed and the application for an enabling order refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Decision affirmed, application refused and dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'enabling Order' 'risk Assessment' 'disqualification for Child Related Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant has rebutted the statutory presumption of risk to the safety of children under section 28(7) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW)' 'Whether the applicant should be granted an enabling order permitting a Working with Children Check clearance despite convictions for serious child-related offences']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant, having been convicted of multiple serious offences of indecent assault against his 10- and 11-year-old daughter, failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the statutory presumption that he poses a risk to the safety of children; therefore, the decision to refuse a Working with Children Check clearance must be affirmed and the application for an enabling order refused.
Court Disposition
Decision affirmed, application refused and dismissed
Orders
- ["The decision of the Children's Guardian dated 22 May 2015 to refuse to grant the applicant a Working with Children Check clearance is affirmed." "The application for review of the decision of the Children's Guardian and for an enabling order filed 16 June 2015 is otherwise refused and dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment