CBV17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1566
The grounds of appeal do not establish that the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider an integer of the Appellant's claim or failed to assess reasonably foreseeable future harm, and no jurisdictional error was established; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: CBV17; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error, Leave to Raise New Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CBV17
Appellant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider an integer of the Appellant's claim regarding risk of harm from M's husband
- 2 Whether the IAA failed to assess the chance of harm into the reasonably foreseeable future by not considering if the return of the Appellant would prompt M's family to report the adultery to the authorities
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal do not establish that the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider an integer of the Appellant's claim or failed to assess reasonably foreseeable future harm, and no jurisdictional error was established; accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave granted for the Appellant to raise grounds set out in the notice of appeal dated 11 April 2022.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment