CC United Developments Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1389
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement and made orders giving effect to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; deferred commencement consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'shop Top Housing' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'deferred Commencement Consent' 'clause 4.6 Height Variation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreed decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement and made orders giving effect to it.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; deferred commencement consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended material listed in the orders, including amended architectural drawings, landscape plans, an updated cl.4.6 written request dated July 2017 and BASIX Certificate No. 620407M_02.' "The Applicant's cl.4.6 written request to vary the height limit is upheld."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment