CC v RAM [2012] NSWSC 1555
Before appointing a trustee company as financial manager where investment management will be outsourced, the court requires clarification of the proposed arrangements and formal undertakings from the manager and adviser that any remuneration received is disclosed and any third-party rewards are accounted for to the protected person's estate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Protective List (guardianship/financial Management) / Interim Judgment Requiring Further Evidence and Undertakings Before Orders May Be Made
- Outcome
- No final orders made; further evidence and undertakings requested before appointment of financial manager.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Financial Manager' 'outsourcing Investment of Managed Estate' 'disclosure of Remuneration and Conflicts of Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Protective List (guardianship/financial Management) / Interim Judgment Requiring Further Evidence and Undertakings Before Orders May Be Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether AET should be appointed financial manager of the defendant's estate under the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW)" 'Whether the outsourcing arrangement with ipac securities limited complies with statutory and fiduciary requirements' 'What undertakings and disclosures are necessary from the financial manager and investment adviser']
Ratio Decidendi
Before appointing a trustee company as financial manager where investment management will be outsourced, the court requires clarification of the proposed arrangements and formal undertakings from the manager and adviser that any remuneration received is disclosed and any third-party rewards are accounted for to the protected person's estate.
Court Disposition
No final orders made; further evidence and undertakings requested before appointment of financial manager.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's solicitor, AET, and ipac to provide further evidence and required undertakings to the court." 'Any affected party may make submissions regarding interim reasons; matter may be listed in court if necessary.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment