CCD16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 343
There is no substantive merit in the new grounds of appeal sought to be raised; since the appellant abandoned the original grounds, and the proposed new grounds fail for lack of merit and procedural reasons, the appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'complementary Protection' 'refugee Status' 'appellate Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to deal properly with a claim of risk of extortion for complementary protection purposes under s 36(2)(aa) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether new personal information could be considered by the Authority under s 473DD(b)(ii) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Authority erred in its findings relating to the credibility and extortion attempt by the TMVP']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no substantive merit in the new grounds of appeal sought to be raised; since the appellant abandoned the original grounds, and the proposed new grounds fail for lack of merit and procedural reasons, the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment