CCM17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1619

CCM17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1619

The Immigration Assessment Authority's misapplication of s 473DD of the Migration Act was immaterial, as there was no realistic possibility of a different outcome had it applied the statutory criteria correctly. The Authority conducted an adequate de novo review to the extent required, and the Secretary's provision of review material was consistent with statutory requirements. No ground of appeal was made out.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (division 2), Reviewing Immigration Assessment Authority's Visa Refusal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 's 473 DD Migration Act' 'de Novo Review' 'materiality of Error' 'review Material Under S 473 Cb']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (division 2), Reviewing Immigration Assessment Authority's Visa Refusal

  1. 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to conduct a de novo review as required in the circumstances' 'Whether the Authority misapplied s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and whether such misapplication was a material error' 'Whether the Secretary complied with the obligations under s 473CB to provide relevant review material to the Authority']

Ratio Decidendi

The Immigration Assessment Authority's misapplication of s 473DD of the Migration Act was immaterial, as there was no realistic possibility of a different outcome had it applied the statutory criteria correctly. The Authority conducted an adequate de novo review to the extent required, and the Secretary's provision of review material was consistent with statutory requirements. No ground of appeal was made out.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]