CCQ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1324

No appeal lies to the Federal Court from the Federal Circuit Court's decision to refuse the applicant's application to extend time; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 30 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics: ['application for Extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'appeal Procedures']

['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['application for Extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'appeal Procedures']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing his application for judicial review.' "Whether there is jurisdiction to grant an extension of time for an appeal against the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time under section 477(2) of the Migration Act."]

Ratio Decidendi

No appeal lies to the Federal Court from the Federal Circuit Court's decision to refuse the applicant's application to extend time; accordingly, the application must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

['The application for an extension of time filed 3 August 2017 be dismissed.' 'The Applicant pay the costs of the first respondent, such costs to be taxed in default of an agreement.']