CCU21 v Minister for Home Affairs (Costs) [2023] FCAFC 112
The Appellant was successful overall in the appeal, and the Minister's arguments for apportionment did not justify departing from the usual rule that costs follow the event; the costs order should stand that the Minister pay the Appellant's costs of the appeal and the trial.
- Parties
- Appellant: CCU21; Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Minister's interlocutory application dismissed; Minister to pay Appellant's costs of the application as taxed, assessed or otherwise agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Appeals, Visa Cancellation, Ministerial Decision Making, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CCU21
Appellant
Minister for Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination After Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister should pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and trial or costs should be apportioned
- 2 Implications of procedural fairness in making costs orders
- 3 Appropriateness of varying previously made costs orders
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant was successful overall in the appeal, and the Minister's arguments for apportionment did not justify departing from the usual rule that costs follow the event; the costs order should stand that the Minister pay the Appellant's costs of the appeal and the trial.
Court Disposition
Minister's interlocutory application dismissed; Minister to pay Appellant's costs of the application as taxed, assessed or otherwise agreed.
Orders
- The Minister's interlocutory application dated 13 June 2023 be dismissed.
- The Minister pay the Appellant's costs of that application as taxed, assessed or otherwise agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment