CDI15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 947
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the grounds relied on by the applicant did not raise sufficient doubt concerning the correctness of the primary judgment to warrant review, and the claims of jurisdictional error and denial of natural justice were broad and unparticularised.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'merits Review' 'protection Visa' 'credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient doubt concerning the correctness of the primary judgment to warrant leave to appeal' 'Whether substantial injustice would be suffered by the applicant if leave to appeal were refused' 'Whether there was jurisdictional error or denial of natural justice by the Federal Circuit Court or Tribunal']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the grounds relied on by the applicant did not raise sufficient doubt concerning the correctness of the primary judgment to warrant review, and the claims of jurisdictional error and denial of natural justice were broad and unparticularised.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal filed 23 May 2016 be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment