CDJ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 345
Although the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to properly apply s 473DD to new information (the Summons), the error was not material because the Authority had considered and rejected the document's credibility and relevance, so the outcome of the review could not have been any different.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Disposition
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted on limited ground; appeal dismissed; costs ordered against applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Migration Decisions' 'immigration Assessment Authority Procedure' 'leave to Appeal' 'materiality of Procedural Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to comply with s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in considering new information (the Summons)' 'Whether any such error was material and constituted jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to properly apply s 473DD to new information (the Summons), the error was not material because the Authority had considered and rejected the document's credibility and relevance, so the outcome of the review could not have been any different.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted on limited ground; appeal dismissed; costs ordered against applicant
Orders
- ['Leave granted to appeal limited to whether the Authority erred regarding s 473DD and the Summons, and if so, whether the error was material.' 'Appeal dismissed.' "Applicant to pay first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment