CDT v Children’s Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 132
Although the disqualifying offence was serious, the applicant's good character, absence of any misconduct for more than 56 years, lack of any further offence or complaint involving children or adults, long history working with children, and positive character evidence persuaded the Tribunal that he does not present a real and appreciable risk to the safety of any child and had satisfied the statutory onus. The Tribunal was therefore satisfied that an enabling order should be made and that the Children's Guardian should grant a Working with Children Check Clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enabling Order Under the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 Following Refusal of a Working With Children Check Clearance / Final Determination by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales, Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
- Outcome
- Application granted; enabling order made and Working with Children Check Clearance ordered to be granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check Clearance' 'disqualifying Conviction' 'enabling Order' 'risk to Safety of Children']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Enabling Order Under the Child Protection (working With Children) Act 2012 Following Refusal of a Working With Children Check Clearance / Final Determination by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales, Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be declared not to be treated as a disqualified person for the purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 in respect of his conviction for assault female with act of indecency.' 'Whether the applicant proved, contrary to the statutory presumption, that he does not pose a risk to the safety of children.' "Whether the Children's Guardian must grant the applicant a Working with Children Check Clearance."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the disqualifying offence was serious, the applicant's good character, absence of any misconduct for more than 56 years, lack of any further offence or complaint involving children or adults, long history working with children, and positive character evidence persuaded the Tribunal that he does not present a real and appreciable risk to the safety of any child and had satisfied the statutory onus. The Tribunal was therefore satisfied that an enabling order should be made and that the Children's Guardian should grant a Working with Children Check Clearance.
Court Disposition
Application granted; enabling order made and Working with Children Check Clearance ordered to be granted.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal declares that the applicant, CDT, is not to be treated as a "disqualified person" for purposes of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 in respect to the offence of assault with act of indecency of which he was convicted by Sydney Quarter Sessions on 26 August 1960.' "The Children's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment